[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911141051.GK22042@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:10:51 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 1/2] freezer: check OOM kill while being frozen
On Thu 11-09-14 16:26:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 04:04:48 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 11-09-14 16:17:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [...]
> > > And I'm still wondering if the OOM killer may be made avoid killing frozen
> > > tasks.
> >
> > This is really tricky. OOM killer aims at the biggest memory hog. We
> > shouldn't ignore it just because it hides into the fridge... So even
> > if we "fix" oom killer to ignore frozen tasks (which is inherently
> > racy btw.) then we have a potential problem of freezer abuse (e.g. in
> > container environments). So I strongly believe that the OOM killer has
> > to be able to kill a frozen tasks.
>
> OK
>
> Is the OOM killer the only place where TIF_MEMDIE is set?
Yes. To be precise, lowmemorykiller (staging android thingy), global OOM
killer and memcg OOM killer. Any other users would be an abuse.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists