linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq work on tick v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140912180547.GB5824@lerouge>
Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 2014 20:05:49 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@...il.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq work on tick v2

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:28:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:33:20PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > Frederic Weisbecker (7):
> >       nohz: Move nohz full init call to tick init
> >       irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt
> >       x86: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >       arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >       arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >       nohz: Consolidate nohz full init code
> >       nohz: nohz full depends on irq work self IPI support
> > 
> > Peter Zijlstra (1):
> >       irq_work: Introduce arch_irq_work_has_interrupt()
> 
> Looks ok to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

Intel? :-) Wow.

Thanks a lot!

Note, I fear I'll have to turn the static_cpu_has into cpu_has. The
alternatives code which initialize all static_cpu_has() things
is called from check_bugs() in start_kernel() which is way after
IRQs are enabled for the 1st time. irq_work_tick() has many opportunities
to run in between.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/