[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140912190057.GQ16043@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:00:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] nohz: Fix nohz kick irq work on tick v2
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:05:49PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Intel? :-) Wow.
Yeah, moved about a month ago :-)
> Note, I fear I'll have to turn the static_cpu_has into cpu_has. The
> alternatives code which initialize all static_cpu_has() things
> is called from check_bugs() in start_kernel() which is way after
> IRQs are enabled for the 1st time. irq_work_tick() has many opportunities
> to run in between.
Ah well. It was worth a try I suppose.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists