linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix regression that accidentally disabled block-based tcq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140913175047.GA28882@infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:50:47 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix regression that accidentally disabled
 block-based tcq

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Yes this one does the trick and fixes things. Note the git tree I used for
> testing also had your previous fix to split up the blk_tcq union in 2
> separate struct members. Let me know if you want me to re-test without that
> fix.

I'm pretty sure that isn't needed, so double testing it indeed doesn't
would be helpful.  I'd like to add your Tested-by: tag after that, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/