linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix regression that accidentally disabled block-based tcq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 11:41:40 +0200
From:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix regression that accidentally disabled block-based
 tcq

Hi,

On 09/13/2014 07:50 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Yes this one does the trick and fixes things. Note the git tree I used for
>> testing also had your previous fix to split up the blk_tcq union in 2
>> separate struct members. Let me know if you want me to re-test without that
>> fix.
> 
> I'm pretty sure that isn't needed, so double testing it indeed doesn't
> would be helpful.

I can confirm that things still work fine with the union left in place.

>  I'd like to add your Tested-by: tag after that, too.

Ack:

Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/