[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5416AFFD.5090207@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:23:09 +0200
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <axboe@...com>, <felipe.franciosi@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/4] Multi-queue support for xen-blkfront
and xen-blkback
El 22/08/14 a les 13.20, Arianna Avanzini ha escrit:
> Hello,
[...]
> The patchset implements in the backend driver the retrieval of information
> about the currently-in-use block layer API for a certain device and about
> the number of available submission queues, if the API turns out to be the
> multi-queue one. The information is then advertised to the frontend driver
> via XenStore. The frontend device can exploit such an information to allocate
> and grant multiple I/O rings that the backend will be able to map.
> The patchset has been tested with fio's IOmeter emulation on a four-cores
> machine with a null_blk device (some results are available here: [2]).
Have you tried if using multiple queues (rings) between blkfront and
blkback even when the underlying device doesn't use MQ increases the
throughput?
Roger.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists