[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140915152554.GA26218@sudip-PC>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:55:54 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sound: pci: ctxfi: pr_* replaced with dev_*
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:29:48PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:39:41 +0530,
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > pr_* macros replaced with dev_* as they are more preffered over pr_*.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > ---
> >
> > in v1 Takashi mentioned that now we have card->dev
> > so v2 is using card->dev as much as possible.
> >
> > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> > sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k1.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k2.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctmixer.c | 6 ++++--
> > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctpcm.c | 9 ++++++---
> > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> > sound/pci/ctxfi/xfi.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > 7 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c
> > index d92a08c..a786bc1 100644
> > --- a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c
> > +++ b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c
> > @@ -1282,8 +1282,8 @@ static int atc_identify_card(struct ct_atc *atc, unsigned int ssid)
> > p = snd_pci_quirk_lookup_id(vendor_id, device_id, list);
> > if (p) {
> > if (p->value < 0) {
> > - pr_err("ctxfi: Device %04x:%04x is black-listed\n",
> > - vendor_id, device_id);
> > + dev_err(atc->card->dev, "ctxfi: Device %04x:%04x is black-listed\n",
> > + vendor_id, device_id);
>
> You need no prefix for dev_xxx().
>
i was also thinking that . :)
> > diff --git a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c
> > index e49d2be..80beecb 100644
> > --- a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c
> > +++ b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c
> (snip)
> > @@ -282,8 +287,9 @@ int rsc_mgr_uninit(struct rsc_mgr *mgr)
> > case SUM:
> > break;
> > default:
> > - pr_err("ctxfi: Invalid resource type value %d!\n",
> > - mgr->type);
> > + dev_err(&(((struct hw *)mgr->hw)->pci->dev),
> > + "ctxfi: Invalid resource type value %d!\n",
> > + mgr->type);
>
> Did you really conclude that this is the best way?
> Also, is it good to mix up the usages of both card->dev and &pci->dev?
> Think again.
>
i have a doubt regarding this :-
in the snd_card_new() card->dev is being assigned with &pci->dev ,
then are not they the same ?
i was trying to get some way of finding out the reference of card->dev from the resource manager ,
but ... :(
i will try again and if i cant find any way i will ask for some hint from you.
i am still a newbie , and started this pr_* to dev_* on your inspiration , and i hope
you will not be irritated by my patches . :)
thanks
sudip
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists