linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/18] ACPI / table: Print GIC information when MADT is parsed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:52:50 -0700
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/18] ACPI / table: Print GIC information when MADT
 is parsed

On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:40:10 -0700, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:08PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > When MADT is parsed, print GIC information to make the boot
> > log look pretty.
> 
> If you do this for prettiness, having an example output in the commit
> message would be a nice touch.

Agreed.

> The question is why it's needed though? Do we really need all this verbose
> information in dmesg when it could be found out in other ways instead?
> 
> x86 is notoriously verbose in some of these aspects, I'm not sure it's
> something we need to mimic here?

For consistency, it does make sense to have the common x86 and ARM64
code outputing information in the same way, so I think the patch still
makes sense. All of them could be moved to KERN_DEBUG as a separate
patch if we want to cull early boot output. I would split that off and
discuss it separately.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/