lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54180899.4060408@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:53:29 +0800 From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, bp@...en8.de, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, imammedo@...hat.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>, Linn Crosetto <linn@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU Hi Mike, 于 14-9-16 上午11:56, Mike Galbraith 写道: > On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 10:44 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 06:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >>>> There is no response for two months since posting v4. >>>> What can I do for pushing the patch to upstream? >>> Looks to me like we have two patches floating about for more or less the >>> same problem, this one, and... >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/29/159 >>> >>> ..this one, which you reviewed, and HP both reviewed and tested. >>> >>> We seem to kinda stuck with Boris having said don't diddle the >>> cpu_llc_shared_map, but HP/Intel saying that this map diddling fixes >>> their explosions. If your alternative is preferred over diddling >>> cpu_llc_shared_map, perhaps HP/Intel can test/confirm that their >>> explosions stay gone? >> Well, Boris mentioned later in his email: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/22/201 >> >> And I agree with his assessment that both patches make sense. > Nonetheless, this just reeks of "department of redundancy department". > I have nothing against doing both really, but it does leave me wondering > if we would not then be merging the mask clearing "just because". Maybe you miss my reply. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/29/40 Regards, Wanpeng Li > > -Mike > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists