lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:00:33 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, bp@...en8.de, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, imammedo@...hat.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>, Linn Crosetto <linn@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 17:53 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Hi Mike, > > 于 14-9-16 上午11:56, Mike Galbraith 写道: > > On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 10:44 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > >> On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 06:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > >>>> There is no response for two months since posting v4. > >>>> What can I do for pushing the patch to upstream? > >>> Looks to me like we have two patches floating about for more or less the > >>> same problem, this one, and... > >>> > >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/29/159 > >>> > >>> ..this one, which you reviewed, and HP both reviewed and tested. > >>> > >>> We seem to kinda stuck with Boris having said don't diddle the > >>> cpu_llc_shared_map, but HP/Intel saying that this map diddling fixes > >>> their explosions. If your alternative is preferred over diddling > >>> cpu_llc_shared_map, perhaps HP/Intel can test/confirm that their > >>> explosions stay gone? > >> Well, Boris mentioned later in his email: > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/22/201 > >> > >> And I agree with his assessment that both patches make sense. > > Nonetheless, this just reeks of "department of redundancy department". > > I have nothing against doing both really, but it does leave me wondering > > if we would not then be merging the mask clearing "just because". > > Maybe you miss my reply. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/29/40 Yes, I did. Thanks. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists