lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:43:34 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	acpi4asus-user <acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	platform-driver-x86 <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] eeepc-laptop: compare proper return values in
 get_cpufv

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:40:37PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:27:15PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > 
> > - When reading and writing sysfs device attribute files, avoid dependency
> >   on specific error codes wherever possible. This minimizes coupling to
> >   the error handling implemementation within the kernel.
> > 
> >   In general, failures to read or write sysfs device attributes shall
> >   propogate errors wherever possible. Common errors include, but are not
> >   limited to:
> > 
> >   -EIO: The read or store operation is not supported, typically returned by
> >         the sysfs system itself if the read or store pointer is NULL.
> > 
> >   -ENXIO: The read or store operation failed
> > 
> >   Error codes will not be changed without good reason, and should a change
> >   to error codes result in user-space breakage, it will be fixed, or the
> >   the offending change will be reverted.
> 
> sysfs-rules.txt is written for user space? In that case, reverting the
> change is as much a fix as patching it.
> 
> > 
> >   Userspace applications can, however, expect the format and contents of
> >   the attribute files to remain consistent in the absence of a version
> >   attribute change in the context of a given attributes.

Agreed, but I wanted to make this clear to kernel devs reading this as well,
rather than duplicating this blurb elsewhere.

> 
> ...attribute.
> 
> That's it for the nit-picking.

Thanks for the plural catch.

I'll send to Greg as a patch.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists