lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:12:27 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>, pbonzini@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: structs for cpuid info in x86 On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > If hpa, tglx or Linus objects I'll yield to that objection > though. > > Opinions, objections? They generally look fine to me. I appreciate the bitfields for readability. I often use the same when having to deal with hardware bitfields. See for example the cpuid10_a?x unions in asm/perf_event.h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists