lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:18:46 +0300
From:	Or Gerlitz <>
To:	Roland Dreier <>
CC:	Or Gerlitz <>,
	Latchesar Ionkov <>,
	"" <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	Sagi Grimberg <>,
	"Linux Kernel" <>,
	Haggai Eran <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 for-next 00/16] On demand paging

On 9/13/2014 12:16 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Per your request we provided the information on tests conducted with
> the patches.
> Note that the patches can't really disrupt existing applications that
> don't set the new IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND MR flag when they register
> memory. Also the whole set of changes to the umem area is dependent on building with
> CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING -- all in all, everything is in
> place for protecting against potential regression that this series
> could introduce.
> As you didn't provide any feedback for > six months, and we have all
> the above in place (report on stability tests, performance data and
> mechanics to avoid regressions) I think it would be fair to get this
> picked for the coming merge window, thoughts?


Can you please comment here, not only that you didn't provide any 
feedback on the patches, you
are even not willing to respond if the the data we gave addresses your 
questions on testing and performance. Are you planning to pick this to 
the next merge window?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists