[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5419A67B.8060909@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:19:23 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Make clock initialization more robust
On 09/17/2014 03:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Don't abort clock initialization if we cannot match an entry in
> tegra_clk_init_table to a valid entry in the clk array.
>
> Also log a corresponding error message.
>
> This was discovered when testing a patch that removed the EMC clock from
> tegra124_clks but left a mention in tegra_clk_init_table.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists