[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35FD53F367049845BC99AC72306C23D103D6DB491612@CNBJMBX05.corpusers.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:05:04 +0800
From: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
To: "'linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org'"
<linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
'Srinivas Kandagatla' <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
"'dwalker@...o99.com'" <dwalker@...o99.com>,
"'bryanh@...eaurora.org'" <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
"'linux@....linux.org.uk'" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: [RFC] msm:rpm-smd:change msm_rpm_smd_work method
this change msm_rpm_smd_work method to let it
run not as a forever loop, this can improve some
performance, because if the work_struct callback run
forever, it will hold the work thread forever, and other
work_struct can use it, it is not suitable for performance.
Change-Id: Ic99b36f8a3720b2bdfe45e4263a69f3d58c47cd1
Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@...ymobile.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-msm/rpm-smd.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/rpm-smd.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/rpm-smd.c
index 2a01a36..243463d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/rpm-smd.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/rpm-smd.c
@@ -464,8 +464,6 @@ struct msm_rpm_ack_msg {
LIST_HEAD(msm_rpm_ack_list);
-static DECLARE_COMPLETION(data_ready);
-
static void msm_rpm_notify_sleep_chain(struct rpm_message_header *hdr,
struct msm_rpm_kvp_data *kvp)
{
@@ -654,7 +652,7 @@ static void msm_rpm_notify(void *data, unsigned event)
switch (event) {
case SMD_EVENT_DATA:
- complete(&data_ready);
+ queue_work(msm_rpm_smd_wq, &msm_rpm_data.work);
break;
case SMD_EVENT_OPEN:
complete(&pdata->smd_open);
@@ -849,19 +847,15 @@ static void msm_rpm_smd_work(struct work_struct *work)
int errno;
char buf[MAX_ERR_BUFFER_SIZE] = {0};
- while (1) {
- wait_for_completion(&data_ready);
-
- spin_lock(&msm_rpm_data.smd_lock_read);
- while (smd_is_pkt_avail(msm_rpm_data.ch_info)) {
- if (msm_rpm_read_smd_data(buf))
- break;
- msg_id = msm_rpm_get_msg_id_from_ack(buf);
- errno = msm_rpm_get_error_from_ack(buf);
- msm_rpm_process_ack(msg_id, errno);
- }
- spin_unlock(&msm_rpm_data.smd_lock_read);
+ spin_lock(&msm_rpm_data.smd_lock_read);
+ while (smd_is_pkt_avail(msm_rpm_data.ch_info)) {
+ if (msm_rpm_read_smd_data(buf))
+ break;
+ msg_id = msm_rpm_get_msg_id_from_ack(buf);
+ errno = msm_rpm_get_error_from_ack(buf);
+ msm_rpm_process_ack(msg_id, errno);
}
+ spin_unlock(&msm_rpm_data.smd_lock_read);
}
static void msm_rpm_log_request(struct msm_rpm_request *cdata)
@@ -1237,7 +1231,7 @@ wait_ack_cleanup:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msm_rpm_data.smd_lock_read, flags);
if (smd_is_pkt_avail(msm_rpm_data.ch_info))
- complete(&data_ready);
+ queue_work(msm_rpm_smd_wq, &msm_rpm_data.work);
return rc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(msm_rpm_wait_for_ack_noirq);
@@ -1385,10 +1379,10 @@ static int __devinit msm_rpm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!standalone) {
msm_rpm_smd_wq = alloc_workqueue("rpm-smd",
- WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 1);
+ WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM |
+ WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_NON_REENTRANT, 1);
if (!msm_rpm_smd_wq)
return -EINVAL;
- queue_work(msm_rpm_smd_wq, &msm_rpm_data.work);
}
of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev);
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists