[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541A7286.1080008@realsil.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:49:58 +0800
From: micky <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<rogerable@...ltek.com>, <wei_wang@...lsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: rtsx: fix PM suspend for 5227 & 5249
On 09/18/2014 12:53 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2014, micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn wrote:
>
>> From: Micky Ching <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
>>
>> Fix rts5227&5249 failed send buffer cmd after suspend,
>> PM_CTRL3 should reset before send any buffer cmd after suspend.
>> Otherwise, buffer cmd will failed, this will lead resume fail.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Micky Ching <micky_ching@...lsil.com.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/rts5227.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/mfd/rts5249.c | 4 ++++
>> drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> I think you'll find you just broke the build.
>
> What happens when you compile these as modules?
I build as modules with no warning or error, did you find anything wrong?
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c b/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c
>> index 9c8eec8..8222a31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rts5227.c
>> @@ -128,8 +128,27 @@ static int rts5227_extra_init_hw(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
>> return rtsx_pci_send_cmd(pcr, 100);
>> }
>>
>> +int rts5227_pm_reset(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + /* init aspm */
>> + err = rtsx_pci_update_cfg_byte(pcr, LCTLR, 0xFC, 0);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + /* reset PM_CTRL3 before send buffer cmd */
>> + return rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, PM_CTRL3, 0x10, 0x00);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int rts5227_optimize_phy(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
>> {
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = rts5227_pm_reset(pcr);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> /* Optimize RX sensitivity */
>> return rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, 0x00, 0xBA42);
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
>> index 573de7b..0f1b0e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,10 @@ static int rts5249_optimize_phy(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
>> {
>> int err;
>>
>> + err = rts5227_pm_reset(pcr);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
> I don't like this. Place rts52xx_pm_reset() somewhere more central.
> Perhaps an inline function in the header would be better?
Thanks, I will fix later.
>> err = rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, PHY_REG_REV,
>> PHY_REG_REV_RESV | PHY_REG_REV_RXIDLE_LATCHED |
>> PHY_REG_REV_P1_EN | PHY_REG_REV_RXIDLE_EN |
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
>> index 07e4c2e..acc7a1e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.h
>> @@ -72,4 +72,5 @@ do { \
>> pcr->ms_pull_ctl_disable_tbl = __device##_ms_pull_ctl_disable_tbl; \
>> } while (0)
>>
>> +int rts5227_pm_reset(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr);
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
>> index 74346d5..b34fec8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
>> @@ -967,4 +967,16 @@ static inline u8 *rtsx_pci_get_cmd_data(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
>> return (u8 *)(pcr->host_cmds_ptr);
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int rtsx_pci_update_cfg_byte(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, int addr,
>> + u8 mask, u8 append)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> + u8 val;
>> +
>> + err = pci_read_config_byte(pcr->pci, addr, &val);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> + return pci_write_config_byte(pcr->pci, addr, (val & mask) | append);
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists