linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UBI: Fix possible deadlock in erase

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <541C0CFE.2090609@nod.at>
Date:	Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:01:18 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com
CC:	dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Fix possible deadlock in erase_worker()

Am 19.09.2014 12:47, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 11:46 +0200, Richard Weinberg
>> Or we apply "[PATCH 1/2] UBI: Call worker functions without work_sem held". :)
> 
> But I explained in the other e-mail that the semaphore is needed, and
> why.

Sorry, I completely misunderstood your mail.
Rereading it now.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/