[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541DBEEC.6010305@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:52:44 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/10] OF: Introduce helper function for getting PCI
domain_nr
On 09/17/2014 08:30 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Add of_pci_get_domain_nr() to retrieve the PCI domain number
> of a given device from DT. If the information is not present,
> the function can be requested to allocate a new domain number.
>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> ---
[...]
> +/**
> + * This function will try to obtain the host bridge domain number by
> + * using of_alias_get_id() call with "pci-domain" as a stem. If that
> + * fails, a local allocator will be used. The local allocator can
> + * be requested to return a new domain_nr if the information is missing
> + * from the device tree.
> + *
> + * @node: device tree node with the domain information
> + * @allocate_if_missing: if DT lacks information about the domain nr,
> + * allocate a new number.
> + *
> + * Returns the associated domain number from DT, or a new domain number
> + * if DT information is missing and @allocate_if_missing is true. If
> + * @allocate_if_missing is false then the last allocated domain number
> + * will be returned.
> + */
> +int of_pci_get_domain_nr(struct device_node *node, bool allocate_if_missing)
> +{
> + int domain;
> +
> + domain = atomic_read(&of_domain_nr);
> + if (domain == -1) {
> + /* first run, get max defined domain nr in device tree */
> + domain = of_get_max_pci_domain_nr();
> + /* then set the start value for allocator to be max + 1 */
> + atomic_set(&of_domain_nr, domain + 1);
atomic_read followed by atomic_set is not an atomic operation.
As I previously said, I don't like how this function is a mixture of
data retrieval and domian # allocation. I think we need 2 functions.
> + }
> + domain = of_alias_get_id(node, "pci-domain");
I still do not like using aliases here. Just put pci-domain or
linux,pci-domain into the PCI node.
I think we should assume all PCI root buses either have a domain
property or they don't and a mixture is an error. I'm not sure if that
simplifies the code or not though.
In the interest of merging, I think you should just do a simple
allocation and add the DT domain handling as a second step. You will
also need to document the DT part.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists