[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140922130351.GL5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:03:51 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Anders Berg <anders.berg@...gotech.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: axxia: Add I2C driver for AXM55xx
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:59:39AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> IRQ_NONE is "this interrupt wasn't by me" so for shared IRQs, the next
> handler can check.
Err, no it isn't. IRQ_NONE has no such effect. All handlers on a
shared interrupt are always run irrespective of the return value from
any particular interrupt handler. See kernel/irq/handle.c.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists