[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54203A73.8030103@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:04:19 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>, <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3 v2] xen/xenbus: Improve failure processing
code for __xenbus_switch_state()
On 18/09/14 15:01, Chen Gang wrote:
> When failure occurs, need return failure code instead of 0, or some of
> indirect upper callers may misunderstand.
>
> e.g. in "block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c":
>
> connect() -> xenbus_switch_state() -> __xenbus_switch_state().
Can you make xenbus_switch_state() void? The callers don't need to do
any error handling.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists