linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] OF: PCI: Add support for parsing PCI host bridge resources from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKw-KSdDGgFuHytONKA-53-z+QtQd+0JzLhW+Xs0+knsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:11:29 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] OF: PCI: Add support for parsing PCI host
 bridge resources from DT

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 01:28:38AM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 09/19/2014 04:06 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:30:23AM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> >> Provide a function to parse the PCI DT ranges that can be used to
>> >> create a pci_host_bridge structure together with its associated
>> >> bus.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> >> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
>> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
>> >> ---
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> +int of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(struct device_node *dev,
>> >> +                  unsigned char busno, unsigned char bus_max,
>> >> +                  struct list_head *resources, resource_size_t *io_base)
>> >> +{
>> >> +  struct resource *res;
>> >> +  struct resource *bus_range;
>> >> +  struct of_pci_range range;
>> >> +  struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>> >> +  char range_type[4];
>> >> +  int err;
>> >> +
>> >> +  if (!io_base)
>> >> +          return -EINVAL;
>> >> +  *io_base = OF_BAD_ADDR;
>> >> +
>> >> +  bus_range = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus_range), GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> This function does a lot of kalloc's but there is not an easy way to
>> undo those allocations. Hot unplug of a host bridge or probe error
>> handling would leak memory.
>>
>> You could pass in struct device and use the devm_ variant (also
>> addressing Bjorn's comment), but not having an uninit/remove function
>> make what clean-up drivers have to do error prone. For example, on
>> uninit a driver needs to call pci_free_resource_list.
>
> If the function fails to parse the ranges for whatever reason it will
> call pci_free_resource_list on the resources that have been added already
> and it will clean up. If it is successful, then it is the job of the caller
> to free the list, as mentioned in the comment associated with the function.
>
> The reason why I am reluctant to use devm_ here is that the ranges are only
> parsed here, no filtering is applied. Architectures and/or host bridge
> drivers can/could impose additional restrictions to the list before passing
> it to pci_scan_root_bus() for example.

Okay, as long as the caller has a single clean-up responsibility, I
guess it is fine.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/