lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:12:54 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <>
Cc:	Rob Herring <>, Pawel Moll <>,
	Mark Rutland <>,
	Ian Campbell <>,
	Kumar Gala <>,
	Jason Cooper <>,
	Andrew Lunn <>,
	Gregory Clement <>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	linux-arm <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: mvebu: armada-xp: Correct misnumbered PCIe port nodes

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
<> wrote:
> On 09/20/2014 08:06 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> Currently, Armada XP PCIe nodes are numbered pcie@<N>,0 with N just
>> incrementing. To reflect port/lane relationship, rename the nodes
>> to pcie@<port>,<lane>. While at it, add node aliases to each of pcie
>> controller and port nodes and get rid of now redundant port/lane
>> comments.
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <>
>> ---
> After thinking a while about the current numbering scheme, I have to
> admit that it is correct. The @numbers represent assigned-address of
> the pcie port and this what it is right now.
> If there are no more comments, I'll resend the series without messing
> with the numbering scheme.

If your intention is that these go through my PCI tree, please cc:, because I only look at the linux-pci
patchwork for things to merge.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists