[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140923184926.2fdbb6c6@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:49:26 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...ba.org>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Cc: sfrench@...ba.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] cifs: sanity check length of data to send before
sending
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:09:23 -0400
Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found that
> reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>
>
> commit a26054d184763969a411e3939fe243516715ff59
> Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> Date: Fri Feb 14 07:21:00 2014 -0500
>
> cifs: sanity check length of data to send before sending
>
>
> The regression was introduced as of v3.14-rc7.
>
> It appears the patch may be doing what it is supposed to, since the
> send_length != smb_buf_length:
> send_length=72
> and
> smb_buf_length=2164260932
>
> However, without this check and WARN/return of -EIO the samba
> connections still work correctly.
>
> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
> [0] http://pad.lv/1372482
>
(I'm no longer with Red Hat, so the jlayton@...hat.com address won't
reach me any longer...)
It looks like you probably just need to merge
dca1c8d17a2feae056f9e334ea75a462ae4cb52a into your kernel as well.
Cheers,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...ba.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists