| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <542129F1.1080608@de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:06:09 +0200 From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> CC: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: don't take vcpu mutex for obviously invalid vcpu ioctls On 09/23/2014 08:49 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:29:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 22/09/2014 21:20, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto: >>> "while using trinity to fuzz KVM, we noticed long stalls on invalid ioctls. Lets bail out early on invalid ioctls". or similar? >> >> Okay. David, can you explain how you found it so that I can make up my >> mind? >> >> Gleb and Marcelo, a fourth and fifth opinion? :) >> > I agree with Christian that simpler fix is better here. > The overhead is minimal. If we ever notice this overhead > we can revert the patch all together since the problem it > fixes can only be inflicted on userspace by itself and there > are myriads other ways userspace can hurt itself. > Yes. Davids explanation also makes sense as a commit message. Paolo, if you use David patch with a better description of the "why" I am fine with this patch. Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists