lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:42:33 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>
Cc:	linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	trousers-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" 
	<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
	jarkko.sakkinnen@...ux.intel.com, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] TPM MiniSummit @ LinuxCon Europe

On Sep 22, 2014 2:07 AM, "Peter Huewe" <PeterHuewe@....de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to 'invite' all interested parties in a short TPM minisummit where we can discuss the following hot topics of the TPM subsystem over a beer or two:
>  - State of the TPM Subsystem
>  - De-/Initialization Mess
>  - Devm'ification
>  - Testing
>  - TPM 2.0 Support
>  - Dependencies / interaction with other subsystems (e.g. keyring / IMA)
>  - Status of old 1.1b TPM drivers, deprecation plans
>  - ...
>

I am unlikely to be there, but I have a feature request / food for thought:

Using a mandatory userspace daemon (e.g. trousers) for TPM access
sucks.  Might it be possible to teach the kernel to handle context
save and restore and let multiple processes open the device at once?
Then a daemon wouldn't be necessary.

There would still be a need for some policy (e.g. who can clear the
SRK), but that should be manageable.  Maybe there should be two device
nodes.  /dev/tpm_unpriv would be fully virtualized for access by
multiple processes, but it would only allow use of the key hierarchy
and read access to PCRs.  /dev/tpm_priv would allow NV access, PCR
writes, SRK clears, etc.

--Andy

>
> Please register your interest by filling out this doodle
>  http://doodle.com/q9ezcrivhqrktw6u
>
> I'm not sure if I can get any funding for the summit... but maybe I can arrange something.
>
>
> Also I'm trying to bring along some TPM samples from my employer if possible.
>
>
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> p.s.: experienced kernel developers welcome :)
> _______________________________________________
> Ksummit-discuss mailing list
> Ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ