[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543428E1.7050702@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:54:41 -0400
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>
CC: keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, jarkko.sakkinnen@...ux.intel.com,
"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
trousers-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [TrouSerS-tech] [Ksummit-discuss] TPM MiniSummit @ LinuxCon Europe
On 09/23/2014 12:42 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2014 2:07 AM, "Peter Huewe" <PeterHuewe@....de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to 'invite' all interested parties in a short TPM minisummit where we can discuss the following hot topics of the TPM subsystem over a beer or two:
>> - State of the TPM Subsystem
>> - De-/Initialization Mess
>> - Devm'ification
>> - Testing
>> - TPM 2.0 Support
>> - Dependencies / interaction with other subsystems (e.g. keyring / IMA)
>> - Status of old 1.1b TPM drivers, deprecation plans
>> - ...
>>
> I am unlikely to be there, but I have a feature request / food for thought:
>
> Using a mandatory userspace daemon (e.g. trousers) for TPM access
> sucks. Might it be possible to teach the kernel to handle context
> save and restore and let multiple processes open the device at once?
> Then a daemon wouldn't be necessary.
Why add the complexity of swapping of authenticated sessions and keys
into the kernel if you can handle this in userspace? You need a library
that is aware of the number of key slots and slots for sessions in the
TPM and swaps them in at out when applications need them. Trousers is
such a library that was designed to cope with the limitations of the
device and make its functionality available to all applications that
want to access it.
Stefan
>
> There would still be a need for some policy (e.g. who can clear the
> SRK), but that should be manageable. Maybe there should be two device
> nodes. /dev/tpm_unpriv would be fully virtualized for access by
> multiple processes, but it would only allow use of the key hierarchy
> and read access to PCRs. /dev/tpm_priv would allow NV access, PCR
> writes, SRK clears, etc.
>
> --Andy
>
>> Please register your interest by filling out this doodle
>> http://doodle.com/q9ezcrivhqrktw6u
>>
>> I'm not sure if I can get any funding for the summit... but maybe I can arrange something.
>>
>>
>> Also I'm trying to bring along some TPM samples from my employer if possible.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Peter
>>
>> p.s.: experienced kernel developers welcome :)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ksummit-discuss mailing list
>> Ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> TrouSerS-tech mailing list
> TrouSerS-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/trousers-tech
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists