linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and se

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5421A79F.9010003@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:02:23 -0700
From:	Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] target: Save memory on unused se_dev_entrys and
 se_luns

On 09/18/2014 04:17 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:

> I'm currently reviewing #2, #4, #5 and #7 and will consider merging
> these.  These cleanups account for most of the LOC reduction, and avoid
> most of the larger concerns.
>
> Also for patches like this, they really need testing on your end before
> I'll consider them merging.  Compile testing alone for these types of
> locking changes is not enough, given the history of regressions with
> these types of cleanups.

OK. I'll look for those to show up in your tree, then? And work on 
better dividing up of the remaining changes, and also minimize their 
risk of causing regressions.

Regards -- Andy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/