linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the samsung tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:53:36 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Javier Martinez Canillas' <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	'Mike Turquette' <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the samsung tree

Hi Kukjin,

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:04:36 +0900 Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > After merging the samsung tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts:13:46: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77686.h: No such
> > file or directory
> >  #include <dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77686.h>
> >                                               ^
> > 
> + Mike
> 
> Hmm... I think, inclusion of the header file should be included in Mike's clk
> tree...What's wrong?

Mike's clk tree is included in linux-next well after your tree ... and
does Mike's tree get included in the arm-soc tree like your does?  So,
clearly you can't build this tree on its own?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)