[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140925230124.19023.33551@quantum>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:01:24 -0700
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Kukjin Kim" <kgene@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"'Javier Martinez Canillas'" <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
"'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the samsung tree
Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2014-09-23 22:53:36)
> Hi Kukjin,
>
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:04:36 +0900 Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > After merging the samsung tree, today's linux-next build (arm multi_v7_defconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts:13:46: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77686.h: No such
> > > file or directory
> > > #include <dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77686.h>
> > > ^
> > >
> > + Mike
> >
> > Hmm... I think, inclusion of the header file should be included in Mike's clk
> > tree...What's wrong?
>
> Mike's clk tree is included in linux-next well after your tree ... and
> does Mike's tree get included in the arm-soc tree like your does? So,
> clearly you can't build this tree on its own?
I saw in another thread that Kukjin merged the clk tree into his -next
branch. Is there anything left to do on this one?
Regards,
Mike
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists