linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFiDJ582-Bb2=s+AGsAeTHJMwBkUCUEoEbP770MJgTDkvev0yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:18:50 +0800
From:	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:20:08 LF.Tan wrote:
>> Hi Arnd
>>
>> Are you okay with this generic futex in asm-generic?
>>
>
> Yes, this looks good. Remind me again who need this, would it make
> sense to merge this through an architecture-specific tree for
> whichever architecture can benefit from it?
What is the common practice for this?
Do you mean merge with nios2 or other arch, eg m68k?

Ley Foon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/