linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: qcom: document device tree bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:56:00 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: qcom: document device tree bindings

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:44:44AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:04:37 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > +- clocks : shall contain the input clock phandle
> 
> Just nitpicking, but this is not just a phandle, it's a clock
> descriptor, which is a phandle followed by a set of arguments,
> which may be empty, depending the on the clock controller
> implementation.

We're _extremely_ inconsistent with terminology, so it's not confusing
people don't know what to put here.

Elsewhere people say "phandle + clock specifier" (which is correct),
"clock reference" (which is ok, but sounds like a phandle), etc. From
what I recall some documentation says some *-specifier properties
include the phandle too.

It would be really nice if we had one consistent way of refering to
phandle+args style properties.

> 
> I would just call it 'the input clock', rather than 'input clock
> phandle'.

That's fine by me, given clocks is a well-understood standard property.

Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/