| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFiDJ5-bo_WOz6JockX_BaX0_O0D=+8PjKx7gys-ySKA2KMOaw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:57:54 +0800 From: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/29] asm-generic: add generic futex for !CONFIG_SMP On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2014 18:18:50 Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote: >> > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:20:08 LF.Tan wrote: >> >> Hi Arnd >> >> >> >> Are you okay with this generic futex in asm-generic? >> >> >> > >> > Yes, this looks good. Remind me again who need this, would it make >> > sense to merge this through an architecture-specific tree for >> > whichever architecture can benefit from it? >> What is the common practice for this? >> Do you mean merge with nios2 or other arch, eg m68k? > > I mean do it as part of the nios2 patches. I am okay with this. Do I need to get ACK for all patches in order for nios2 merge into mainline? Thanks. Regards Ley Foon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists