[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1411633925-9018-4-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:32:05 +0800
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
toshi.kani@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tianyu.lan@...el.com,
ktkhai@...allels.com, fabf@...net.be, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa@....edu, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com, tipbot@...or.com,
wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V3 3/3] Cpufreq: Hold cpu_add_remove_lock before change cpufreq_suspended flag
Now, enabling non-boot cpus will parallel with resuming devices.
Cpu online may take place after cpufreq resume. But all cpu should be up
before clearing cpufreq_suspended flag in the cpufreq_resume(). Cpufreq
core uses this flag to decide to do light-weight init or full init. Light
-weight init/tear down is dedicated for cpu hotplug during system pm. To
keep this rule, hold cpu_add_remove_lock during changing cpufreq_suspended
flag.
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 37951ec..b03f7dd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1689,7 +1689,9 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void)
if (!cpufreq_driver)
return;
+ cpu_maps_update_begin();
cpufreq_suspended = false;
+ cpu_maps_update_done();
if (!has_target())
return;
--
1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists