lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140925093605.GA23853@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:36:05 +0100
From:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	'Thomas Abraham' <ta.omasab@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/25/2014 10:17 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > [CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree]
> 
> Thanks for the head up. I was about to send the PR to Rafael.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > That's great, now my Exynos CPUidle DT patch should be rebased on top
> > of this patch so that thanks to the testing carried out by Bart it can be
> > merged too.
> 
> Ok, I am getting confused. How can I rebase the latest patch of your 
> series with a patch no yet available in my tree ?

I just wanted to say that the Exynos CPUidle DT patch depends on this
patch, that is now going through Samsung tree, to make sure we are on
the same page and prevent issues, it was not clear, sorry.

> I propose just to drop the last patch and wait for the next merge to 
> reintegrate it into the cpuidle tree. Does it make sense ?

I agree, drop the Exynos CPUidle DT patch, we will reintegrate it in the
CPUidle tree when the merge window closes and dependencies are sorted out.

Thanks a lot,
Lorenzo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ