lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54240976.5080605@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:24:22 +0200
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz' <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	'Thomas Abraham' <ta.omasab@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs

On 09/25/2014 11:36 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/25/2014 10:17 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> [CC'ed Daniel to make him aware this patch goes through your tree]
>>
>> Thanks for the head up. I was about to send the PR to Rafael.
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>> That's great, now my Exynos CPUidle DT patch should be rebased on top
>>> of this patch so that thanks to the testing carried out by Bart it can be
>>> merged too.
>>
>> Ok, I am getting confused. How can I rebase the latest patch of your
>> series with a patch no yet available in my tree ?
>
> I just wanted to say that the Exynos CPUidle DT patch depends on this
> patch, that is now going through Samsung tree, to make sure we are on
> the same page and prevent issues, it was not clear, sorry.

Ah, ok.

>> I propose just to drop the last patch and wait for the next merge to
>> reintegrate it into the cpuidle tree. Does it make sense ?
>
> I agree, drop the Exynos CPUidle DT patch, we will reintegrate it in the
> CPUidle tree when the merge window closes and dependencies are sorted out.

Perfect. I sent the PR to Rafael.

Thanks

   -- Daniel


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ