[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4oFLKbtddzVoXBN-1dXZn5C4pmzY_QiFMwV+RWtmtjiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:16:36 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] pci, thunder: Add PCIe host controller devicetree bindings
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 00:37:00 Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 24 September 2014 23:34:04 Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
>> >> All on-board PCI devices connected to this PCI controller have fixed resources
>> >> and doesn't have to be allocated/reassigned. Some of these devices are
>> >> SRIOV based.
>> >
>> > I think you need to mark the ones that are nonrelocatable with flag
>> > 0x80000000, otherwise the PCI core might decide to reassign them.
>>
>> Is this flag part of DT pci node properties ?
>> I am using IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED flag. Its there in other patches of
>> the same series.
>
> Ah, right. I checked the source code again and it seems that we don't handle
> this right at the moment. I think a range that has the nonrelocatable
> flag set should be used for IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED mappings without any
> host specific code, but that needs to be implemented in common code.
What connection do you envision between nonrelocatable ranges and
IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED? I don't know what a nonrelocatable range is,
but for IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED, all I intend is that the PCI core should
not try to assign a different address, e.g., because the BAR is
read-only or because it's a legacy IDE/VGA/etc. range for which there
is no BAR at all.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists