[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542389FB.7010109@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:20:27 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftracetest: Add a couple of ftrace test cases
(2014/09/25 10:14), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:35:05 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
>
>> (2014/09/25 0:58), Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:42:35 -0400
>>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I think you'd better use exit_unsupported/exit_xfail to notify
>>>>> that the test target is not configured, or expected to fail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are these functions defined anywhere? I don't seem them in your v5
>>> patch set, or in selftests anywhere.
>>
>> Hmm, could you check my 4/4 patch in the series??
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg730578.html
>
> Hmm, I somehow missed this. Can you check to make sure my for-next
> patches are your latest version. I'll pull in 4/4 tomorrow.
Yeah, I ensured that your for-next patches are the v5. You will be
able to cleanly apply 4/4 on it :)
Thank you,
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists