[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877g0qkj9g.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:06:51 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftracetest: Add a couple of ftrace test cases
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:08:53 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:01:38 -0600
> Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> I am working on adding the framework for c tests. We will have
>> to get this evolved for shell scripts. Please see the following
>> thread:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/23/926
>>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Also, what's the rules for a test that requires other tools. Some of my
> tests require trace-cmd to be installed as well as perf. My stress test
> runs perf against trace-cmd running hackbench (another required tool),
> but I believe that perf has hackbench built in so I could replace
> hackbench with the perf version.
Yeah, and I think we can at least build perf (if not found) for test as
we can always have the source. The trace-cmd is different and it'd be
another reason I need to work on 'perf ftrace' command soon. ;-)
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists