[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuzMepq5KkEc0APbMXpY-tZnv0U0xGMFzhc_uT4YeJETtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:11:30 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 net-next 10/11] bpf: verifier (add verifier core)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:40 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:06:50 -0700
>
>> +#define _(OP) ({ int ret = (OP); if (ret < 0) return ret; })
>
> Please do not hide program control flow inside of a macro.
ok.
I'm pretty sure it will be less readable, but I'll get rid off it.
I'm assuming you considered my arguments about it here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/2/656
No problem. It's a minor thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists