[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140926004908.GC28481@sonymobile.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:49:09 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: use restart_notifier mechanism for
ps_hold
On Thu 25 Sep 00:41 PDT 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> > By converting to the restart_notifier mechanism for restart, we allow
> > for other mechanisms, like the watchdog, to be used for restart in the
> > case where PS_HOLD has failed to reset the chip.
> >
> > Since this mechanism may be one of several mechanisms registered, change
> > the post-ps_hold write timeout to be a more reasonable 1 second instead
> > of 10 seconds.
> >
> > Choose priority 128, as according to documentation, this mechanism "is
> > sufficient to restart the entire system".
> >
> > Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>
> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > Tested-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...rtplayin.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Simplified conditional notifier block registration
> > - Reduced wait time to 1s, which I've found to be sufficient on an IFC6410
> > board.
>
> Björn, are you OK with this patch?
>
Indeed, this is better than overriding arm_pm_restart.
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists