[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201409261046.07132.marex@denx.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:46:07 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: bpqw <bpqw@...ron.com>
Cc: "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"shijie8@...il.com" <shijie8@...il.com>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"grmoore@...era.com" <grmoore@...era.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver:mtd:spi-nor: Add Micron quad I/O support
On Friday, September 26, 2014 at 10:39:38 AM, bpqw wrote:
> >> + /* set EVCR ,enable quad I/O */
> >> + nor->cmd_buf[0] = val & ~EVCR_QUAD_EN_MICRON;
> >> + ret = nor->write_reg(nor, SPINOR_OP_WD_EVCR, nor->cmd_buf, 1, 0);
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + dev_err(nor->dev,
> >> + "error while writing EVCR register\n");
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (wait_till_ready(nor))
> >> + return 1;
> >
> >Why does this not return proper error code or even better, return value
> >from wait_till_ready() ?
> >
> >Other than that, there's nothing wrong with the patch I think.
>
> Hi,Marek
> Thanks for your review,you can find the same usage in the spi-nor.c.
> Below method is OK? Or you can give me some suggestion.
>
> if (wait_till_ready(nor))
> return - EINVAL;
ret = wait_till_readynor()
if (ret)
return ret;
But all right, this means the subsystem isn't perfect. Well, others, what do you
think ?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists