[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7heguy4c4p.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:47:34 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] PM / Domains: Add genpd attach/detach callbacks
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> writes:
> While a PM domain can enable PM runtime management of its devices' module
> clocks by setting
>
> genpd->dev_ops.stop = pm_clk_suspend;
> genpd->dev_ops.start = pm_clk_resume;
>
> this also requires registering the clocks with the pm_clk subsystem.
> In the legacy case, this is handled by the platform code, after
> attaching the device to its PM domain.
>
> When the devices are instantiated from DT, devices are attached to their
> PM domains by generic code, leaving no method for the platform-specific
> PM domain code to register their clocks.
>
> Add two callbacks, allowing a PM domain to perform platform-specific
> tasks when a device is attached to or detached from a PM domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
I replied to the previous RFC, but just to be thorough (and because I
like this approach):
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists