linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140926154536.GA7174@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc:	stable@...r.kernel.org, satoru.takeuchi@...il.com,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.29 release.
> There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Tue Sep 30 11:45:24 CEST 2014.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Hi Jiri,

Build results:
	total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0

Qemu test results:
	total: 21 pass: 21 fail: 0

Both obviously look good, however my tree doesn't match your review request.
It includes 245 patches instead of just 142.

Looks like your tree is a bit ahead of time, so I guess that is ok.
Is there a way for me to avoid this when pulling in your pending changes ?
So far I pull the changes from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your
repository at kernel.org.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/