linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 28 Sep 2014 06:54:10 +0900
From:	Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	satoru.takeuchi@...il.com, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review

At Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0700,
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.29 release.
> > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Tue Sep 30 11:45:24 CEST 2014.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0
> 
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 21 pass: 21 fail: 0
> 
> Both obviously look good, however my tree doesn't match your review request.
> It includes 245 patches instead of just 142.
> 
> Looks like your tree is a bit ahead of time, so I guess that is ok.
> Is there a way for me to avoid this when pulling in your pending changes ?
> So far I pull the changes from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your
> repository at kernel.org.
> 
> Thanks,
> Guenter

Plus, this kernel passed my test.

 - Test Cases:
   - Build this kernel.
   - Boot this kernel.
   - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.

 - Test Tool:
   https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable

 - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
   http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz

 - Build Environment:
   - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
   - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
   - memory: 8GB

 - Test Target Environment:
   - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment)
   - # of vCPU: 2
   - memory: 2GB

Thanks,
Satoru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/