lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:50:21 +0800
From:	"Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
To:	'Catalin Marinas' <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"'linux-mm@...ck.org'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"'linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	'Uwe Kleine-König' 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux 
	<DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux@...ymobile.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be
 page aligned

> -----Original Message-----
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 03:31:42PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:00:02AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 08:09:47AM +0100, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > > this patch extend the start and end address of initrd to be page
> > > > aligned, so that we can free all memory including the un-page
> > > > aligned head or tail page of initrd, if the start or end address
> > > > of initrd are not page aligned, the page can't be freed by
> free_initrd_mem() function.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@...ymobile.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > >
> > > (as I said, if Russell doesn't have any objections please send the
> > > patch to his patch system)
> >
> > I now have an objection.  The patches in the emails were properly
> formatted.
> 
> They were so close ;)
> 
> I can see three patches but none of them exactly right:
> 
> 8157/1 - wrong diff format
> 8159/1 - correct format, does not have my ack (you can take this one if
> 	 you want)
> 8162/1 - got my ack this time but with the wrong diff format again
> 
> Maybe a pull request is a better idea.
> 
I have resend the 2 patches:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8167/1
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8168/1
 
please have a look.

Thanks



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ