[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15815.1412018518@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:21:58 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
Cc: "'Catalin Marinas'" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"'linux-mm@...ck.org'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"'linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
'Uwe Kleine-König'
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux
<DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be page aligned
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:40:54 +0800, "Wang, Yalin" said:
> I am really confused,
> I read this web:
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
> it said use diff -urN to generate patch like this:
>
> diff -Nru linux.orig/lib/string.c linux/lib/string.c
>
> but I see other developers use git format-patch to generate patch and
> submit to the patch system.
> Git format-patch format can also be accepted by the patch system correctly ?
> If yes, I think this web should update,
> Use git format-patch to generate patch is more convenient than use diff -urN
'diff -urN' has the advantage that it will work against a tree extracted
from a release tarball, and doesn't have a requirement that you have git
installed. Having said that, somebody who has access to the website probably
should update it to mention that both methods are acceptable....
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists