linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be page aligned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140930070209.GG31554@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:02:09 +0200
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	"Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>,
	'Catalin Marinas' <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"'linux-mm@...ck.org'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"'linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux 
	<DL-WW-ContributionOfficers-Linux@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] arm:extend the reserved memory for initrd to be
 page aligned

Hello,

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:21:58PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:40:54 +0800, "Wang, Yalin" said:
> 
> > I am really confused,
> > I read this web:
> > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
> > it said use diff -urN to generate patch like this:
> >
> > diff -Nru linux.orig/lib/string.c linux/lib/string.c
> >
> > but I see other developers use git format-patch to generate patch and
> > submit to the patch system.
> > Git format-patch format can also be accepted by the patch system correctly ?
> > If yes, I think this web should update,
> > Use git format-patch to generate patch is more convenient than use diff -urN
> 
> 'diff -urN' has the advantage that it will work against a tree extracted
> from a release tarball, and doesn't have a requirement that you have git
That's wrong, patches generated by git-format-patch are also applicable
just fine on top of an extracted tar ball by patch(1).

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/