lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140929165052.GA2085@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:50:52 +0200
From:	Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@...il.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 watchdog

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:24:11PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > I'm not sure why a) this patch was sent to me in the first place and
> > > b) why anyone would think this should go in through MFD?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Lee,
> > 
> > from a previous mail [1] I (wrongly) assumed that this was going
> > through the MFD tree. If this is not the case, Wim, can you pick the
> > patch?
> > 
> > Beniamino
> > 
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/4/124
> 
> Okay, I see what's happened.
> 
> So actually if there are interdependencies between this and the other
> patches in the set, which I think there are, then you should have kept
> this in the set with the others.  Sending as an independent patch is
> not the correct thing to do.
> 
> Can you resend this, as a patch-set with all of the Acks you have
> acquired please.  I will then take the set as a whole.

The original series had 4 patches:

- MFD core support
- regulator driver
- watchdog driver
- dts documentation

As explained in the submission comment, all patches except watchdog
one have already been applied (1 and 4 to MFD tree, 2 to
regulator). Only the watchdog support is missing and it doesn't have
compilation dependencies to other patches (the watchdog driver can't
be enabled without the MFD core support).

Do you want me to resend the entire patchset or should this go in
through watchdog?

Beniamino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ