lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:18:44 +0200
From:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To:	Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@...il.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 watchdog

Hi Beniamino,

> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:24:11PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure why a) this patch was sent to me in the first place and
> > > > b) why anyone would think this should go in through MFD?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Lee,
> > > 
> > > from a previous mail [1] I (wrongly) assumed that this was going
> > > through the MFD tree. If this is not the case, Wim, can you pick the
> > > patch?
> > > 
> > > Beniamino
> > > 
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/4/124
> > 
> > Okay, I see what's happened.
> > 
> > So actually if there are interdependencies between this and the other
> > patches in the set, which I think there are, then you should have kept
> > this in the set with the others.  Sending as an independent patch is
> > not the correct thing to do.
> > 
> > Can you resend this, as a patch-set with all of the Acks you have
> > acquired please.  I will then take the set as a whole.
> 
> The original series had 4 patches:
> 
> - MFD core support
> - regulator driver
> - watchdog driver
> - dts documentation
> 
> As explained in the submission comment, all patches except watchdog
> one have already been applied (1 and 4 to MFD tree, 2 to
> regulator). Only the watchdog support is missing and it doesn't have
> compilation dependencies to other patches (the watchdog driver can't
> be enabled without the MFD core support).
> 
> Do you want me to resend the entire patchset or should this go in
> through watchdog?

I'll add it to the watchdog tree then.

Kind regads,
Wim.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ