linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D38E8E86660E514AB505863C19C9287C74064FB1@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:17:28 +0000
From:	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC:	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirks

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 05:07:59PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Intel has verified there is no peer-to-peer between functions for the 
> below selection of 82598, 82599, and X520 10G NICs.  These NICs lack 
> an ACS capability, so we're not able to determine this isolation 
> without the help of quirks.  Generalize the Solarflare quirk and add 
> these.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>

> Applied to pci/virtualization for v3.18, thanks!
Acked-by: John Ronciak <John.ronciak@...el.com>

(I don't k now if this is needed at this point but since Alex asked for it, here it is.


Cheers,
John

-----Original Message-----
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelgaas@...gle.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 12:49 PM
To: Alex Williamson
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Ronciak, John
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Intel 10G NIC ACS quirks

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 05:07:59PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Intel has verified there is no peer-to-peer between functions for the 
> below selection of 82598, 82599, and X520 10G NICs.  These NICs lack 
> an ACS capability, so we're not able to determine this isolation 
> without the help of quirks.  Generalize the Solarflare quirk and add 
> these.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>

Applied to pci/virtualization for v3.18, thanks!

> ---
> 
>  drivers/pci/quirks.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c index 
> 95239e0..b6c6500 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -3635,14 +3635,16 @@ static int pci_quirk_intel_pch_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
>  	return acs_flags & ~flags ? 0 : 1;
>  }
>  
> -static int pci_quirk_solarflare_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 
> acs_flags)
> +static int pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 
> +acs_flags)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * SV, TB, and UF are not relevant to multifunction endpoints.
>  	 *
> -	 * Solarflare indicates that peer-to-peer between functions is not
> -	 * possible, therefore RR, CR, and DT are not implemented.  Mask
> -	 * these out as if they were clear in the ACS capabilities register.
> +	 * Multifunction devices are only required to implement RR, CR, and DT
> +	 * in their ACS capability if they support peer-to-peer transactions.
> +	 * Devices matching this quirk have been verified by the vendor to not
> +	 * perform peer-to-peer with other functions, allowing us to mask out
> +	 * these bits as if they were unimplemented in the ACS capability.
>  	 */
>  	acs_flags &= ~(PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_TB | PCI_ACS_RR |
>  		       PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF | PCI_ACS_DT); @@ -3661,8 +3663,28 
> @@ static const struct pci_dev_acs_enabled {
>  	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x439d, pci_quirk_amd_sb_acs },
>  	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x4384, pci_quirk_amd_sb_acs },
>  	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x4399, pci_quirk_amd_sb_acs },
> -	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SOLARFLARE, 0x0903, pci_quirk_solarflare_acs },
> -	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SOLARFLARE, 0x0923, pci_quirk_solarflare_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SOLARFLARE, 0x0903, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SOLARFLARE, 0x0923, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10C6, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10DB, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10DD, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10E1, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10F1, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10F7, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10F8, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10F9, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10FA, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10FB, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x10FC, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1507, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1514, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x151C, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1529, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x152A, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x154D, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x154F, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1551, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1558, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
>  	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_quirk_intel_pch_acs },
>  	{ 0 }
>  };
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/